Antonsky v. City Dye House

Minnesota Supreme Court
Antonsky v. City Dye House, 109 Minn. 96 (Minn. 1909)
123 N.W. 56; 1909 Minn. LEXIS 423
Brown

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 1 citing opinion

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

Antonsky v. City Dye House

Opinion of the Court

BROWN, J.

From a judgment in justice court, defendant appealed upon questions of law and fact to the municipal court of St. Paul. Thereafter, defendant, acting under section 4100, R. L. 1905, properly made and filed an affidavit for a change of venue to the district court of Hennepin county, where it resided. Subsequently, and within the time provided by subdivision 2 of the statute referred to, the municipal court, *97upon application of defendant, made an order transferring the cause to Hennepin county. Plaintiff appealed from that order.

The order is not appealable, and defendant’s motion to dismiss the appeal is granted. Carpenter v. Comfort, 22 Minn. 539; Allis v. White, 59 Minn. 97, 60 N. W. 809.

Appeal dismissed.

Reference

Full Case Name
ANNA ANTONSKY v. CITY DYE HOUSE
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published