Antonsky v. City Dye House
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1921, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Winegar v. Martin (Minn. 1921)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
From a judgment in justice court, defendant appealed upon questions of law and fact to the municipal court of St. Paul. Thereafter, defendant, acting under section 4100, R. L. 1905, properly made and filed an affidavit for a change of venue to the district court of Hennepin county, where it resided. Subsequently, and within the time provided by subdivision 2 of the statute referred to, the municipal court,
The order is not appealable, and defendant’s motion to dismiss the appeal is granted. Carpenter v. Comfort, 22 Minn. 539; Allis v. White, 59 Minn. 97, 60 N. W. 809.
Appeal dismissed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.