Stromme v. Rieck

Minnesota Supreme Court
Stromme v. Rieck, 110 Minn. 472 (Minn. 1910)
125 N.W. 1021; 1910 Minn. LEXIS 1023

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 10 citing opinions

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

Stromme v. Rieck

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from an order, made before judgment, granting-leave to file and serve a proposed supplemental complaint. Is such an order appealable? No. An order, made after judgment, allowing an amended or supplemental pleading, is appealable, because it. directly affects the judgment, and is a final order involving the merits, of the action, or some part thereof. North v. Webster, 36 Minn. 99, 30 N. W. 429; Voak v. National Investment Co., 51 Minn. 450, 53 N. W. 708.

If such an order is made before judgment, it may be reviewed on appeal from the judgment, when entered, or on an appeal from an order denying a motion for a new trial, if the order allowing the amended or supplemental pleading was made on the trial as a part thereof, but no appeal lies from such order made before judgment. City of Winona v. Minn. R. C. Co., 25 Minn. 328; Manwaring v. O’Brien, 75 Minn. 542, 78 N. W. 1; Hanley v. Board of Commrs.. of Cass County, 87 Minn. 209, 91 N. W. 756.

Appeal dismissed.

Reference

Full Case Name
MAUDE H. STROMME v. GUSTAV RIECK and Another
Cited By
10 cases
Status
Published