Stromme v. Rieck
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 2013, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- Metropolitan Sheet Metal Journeyman & Apprentice Training Trust Fund v. County of Ramsey (Minn. 2013)
- Burkholder v. Burkholder (Minn. 1950)
- Hoyt v. Kittson County State Bank (Minn. 1930)
- Greber v. Harris (Minn. 1926)
- Philadelphia Storage Battery Co. v. Hawley (Minn. 1923)
- Goode v. Adams Express Co. (Iowa 1922)
- Chicago Great Western Railroad v. Zahner (Minn. 1921)
- Itasca Cedar & Tie Co. v. McKinley (Minn. 1915)
- Blied v. Barnard (Minn. 1915)
- Swanson v. Alworth (Minn. 1923)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from an order, made before judgment, granting-leave to file and serve a proposed supplemental complaint. Is such an order appealable? No. An order, made after judgment, allowing an amended or supplemental pleading, is appealable, because it. directly affects the judgment, and is a final order involving the merits, of the action, or some part thereof. North v. Webster, 36 Minn. 99, 30 N. W. 429; Voak v. National Investment Co., 51 Minn. 450, 53 N. W. 708.
If such an order is made before judgment, it may be reviewed on appeal from the judgment, when entered, or on an appeal from an order denying a motion for a new trial, if the order allowing the amended or supplemental pleading was made on the trial as a part thereof, but no appeal lies from such order made before judgment. City of Winona v. Minn. R. C. Co., 25 Minn. 328; Manwaring v. O’Brien, 75 Minn. 542, 78 N. W. 1; Hanley v. Board of Commrs.. of Cass County, 87 Minn. 209, 91 N. W. 756.
Appeal dismissed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.