County of Renville v. City of Minneapolis

Minnesota Supreme Court
County of Renville v. City of Minneapolis, 112 Minn. 487 (Minn. 1910)
128 N.W. 669; 1910 Minn. LEXIS 916

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 5 citing opinions

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

County of Renville v. City of Minneapolis

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from an order directing judgment upon the pleadings in defendant’s favor. The order is not appealable, and this court is therefore without jurisdiction. We could not enter upon a consideration of the merits of this case without overruling a well-established rule, as shown by a long line of decisions of this court. Lamb v. McCanna, 14 Minn. 385 (513) ; Rogers v. Holyoke, 14 Minn. 387 (514); Hodgins v. Heaney, 15 Minn. 142 (185); Lockwood v. Bock, 46 Minn. 73, 48 N. W. 458. In U. S. S. L. & B. Co. v. Ahrens, 50 Minn. 332, 52 N. W. 898, it was said: “The point is not made by counsel for respondent, but, following the uniform practice of this court under like circumstances, the appeal is hereby dismissed.” See also Gottstein v. St. Jean, 79 Minn. 232, 82 N. W. 311.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Reference

Full Case Name
COUNTY OF RENVILLE v. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS
Cited By
5 cases
Status
Published