Minnesota Supreme Court, 1910

County of Renville v. City of Minneapolis

County of Renville v. City of Minneapolis
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided December 9, 1910
112 Minn. 487; 128 N.W. 669; 1910 Minn. LEXIS 916 (Minnesota Reports)

County of Renville v. City of Minneapolis

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from an order directing judgment upon the pleadings in defendant’s favor. The order is not appealable, and this court is therefore without jurisdiction. We could not enter upon a consideration of the merits of this case without overruling a well-established rule, as shown by a long line of decisions of this court. Lamb v. McCanna, 14 Minn. 385 (513) ; Rogers v. Holyoke, 14 Minn. 387 (514); Hodgins v. Heaney, 15 Minn. 142 (185); Lockwood v. Bock, 46 Minn. 73, 48 N. W. 458. In U. S. S. L. & B. Co. v. Ahrens, 50 Minn. 332, 52 N. W. 898, it was said: “The point is not made by counsel for respondent, but, following the uniform practice of this court under like circumstances, the appeal is hereby dismissed.” See also Gottstein v. St. Jean, 79 Minn. 232, 82 N. W. 311.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.