Korpi v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.

Minnesota Supreme Court
Korpi v. Oliver Iron Mining Co., 114 Minn. 525 (Minn. 1911)
131 N.W. 372; 1911 Minn. LEXIS 1157

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 2 citing opinions

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

Korpi v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Demurrer to a complaint, which charges that the defendant maintained an unprotected tub or vat in a public street of the village of Hibbing, into which it caused to be discharged hot water from a pipe connecting with a steam boiler located on defendant’s adjoining property j that plaintiff’s child was passing by, stopped, and was looking at the vat, when he became suddenly alarmed and frightened by a number of .children, who had congregated about and were playing in the vicinity, and as a result thereof slipped and fell into it, and was seriously scalded.

Held, it fairly appears from the facts stated that the proximate cause of the injury was the unguarded vat. McDowell v. Village of Preston, 104 Minn. 263, 116 N. W. 470, 18 L.R.A. (N.S.) 190. The complaint states a cause of action. Svendsen v. Village of Alden, 101 Minn. 158, 112 N. W. 10. Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
MATTI KORPI v. OLIVER IRON MINING COMPANY
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published