Minnesota Supreme Court, 1912

State Board of Law Examiners v. Bensel

State Board of Law Examiners v. Bensel
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided October 11, 1912
119 Minn. 532; 137 N.W. 1115; 1912 Minn. LEXIS 522 (Minnesota Reports)

Counsel

Frank L. Clift, president of State Board of Law Examiners, for complainant., O. D. Bensel and Stevens & Stevens, for respondent.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1913, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

State Board of Law Examiners v. Bensel

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Application of the State Board of Law Examiners for the removal of C. D. Bensel from his office as attorney and counselor in the courts of this state. '

The charge against respondent is wilful misconduct, wilful violation of his oath and of the duties imposed upon him as an attorney and counselor. The specific charge was that respondent commenced for a client three actions in the district court for Chippewa county against three separate women, in each of which actions it was sought to recover damages for slander. In each complaint, respondent caused to be inserted a paragraph containing grossly libelous charges against each of the defendants, which matters so inserted were wholly irrelevant to any issue in the case, and were alleged to have been wilfully and maliciously inserted by respondent.

After a careful consideration of the evidence as reported by the referee, and the arguments of counsel, we find respondent guilty of wilful misconduct as charged.

It is therefore ordered that respondent C. D. Bensel be and he is hereby suspended from his office as attorney and counselor at law in the courts of this state for the period of one year from the filing of this order.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.