Minnesota Supreme Court, 1913

State ex rel. Kent v. McDonald

Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided April 18, 1913

121 Minn. 525; 141 N.W. 112; 1913 Minn. LEXIS 805 (Minnesota Reports)

Counsel

Mead & Brymgelson, for appellants., Daniel Fish, City Attorney, and W. G. Compton, Assistant City Attorney, for respondent.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The questions presented in this case are identical with those presented im State ex rel. Salter v. McDonald, supra, page 207, 141 N. W. 110, and the same-result is reached.

The order discharging the writ of habeas corpus is affirmed, and the relator is remanded to the custody of the respondent.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.