Minnesota Supreme Court, 1914

Skaggs v. Illinois Central Railroad

Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided May 22, 1914

125 Minn. 532; 147 N.W. 1135; 1914 Minn. LEXIS 820 (Minnesota Reports)

Counsel

Butler & Mitchell, for appellant., Barton & Kay, for respondent.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. Carroll (Ind. 1928)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment awarding damages in an action for personal injuries.

*533The case was before this court on a prior appeal from an order denying a hew trial. See 124 Minn. 503, 145 N. W. 381. The same grounds for reversal are presented as before.

For reasons stated on the former appeal the judgment is affirmed, and it is so ordered.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.