Minnesota Supreme Court, 1914

Tyndall v. Dubois

Tyndall v. Dubois
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided May 29, 1914
125 Minn. 536; 147 N.W. 708; 1914 Minn. LEXIS 824 (Minnesota Reports)

Counsel

Thwing & Rossman, for appellant., Van Derlip & Lum, for respondent.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1922, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Tyndall v. Dubois

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This case is controlled by the decision in Washburn v. Gregory Co. supra, page 491, 147 N. W. 706, or, more correctly speaking, it is controlled by that case as far as the question whether plaintiff’s tax deed covers the mineral rights of *537defendant Walker is concerned. It is urged that the reservation by Walker gave him no estate in the land, but at most a mere easement. This question is disposed of by Buck v. Walker, 115 Minn. 239, 132 N. W. 205, Ann. Cas. 1912D, 882. We are content with the decision in that case, and hold that the mineral interest reserved was land.

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.