State ex rel. Virginia & Rainy Lake Co. v. Bashko

Minnesota Supreme Court
State ex rel. Virginia & Rainy Lake Co. v. Bashko, 127 Minn. 519 (Minn. 1914)
148 N.W. 1082; 1914 Minn. LEXIS 933
Ctjbiam

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 3 citing opinions

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

State ex rel. Virginia & Rainy Lake Co. v. Bashko

Opinion of the Court

Pee Ctjbiam.

The attorneys have stipulated that this case shall he deemed to be before this court as upon a writ of certiorari, but no such writ was ever applied for or issued. They seek to review the findings of the district court in this manner, although no judgment has been entered in that court. Even if such findings could be reviewed by writ of certiorari, and if the parties could substitute a stipulation in place of the writ, neither of which can be conceded, the time within which such findings could be so reviewed had expired before the making of the present stipulation.

This court has never acquired jurisdiction of the ease and the proceedings in this court are dismissed.

Reference

Full Case Name
STATE ex rel. VIRGINIA & RAINY LAKE COMPANY v. STANLEY BASHKO
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published