State ex rel. Virginia & Rainy Lake Co. v. Bashko
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1962, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Plunkett v. First National Bank of Austin (Minn. 1962)
- Gartner v. Hogstad Fish Co. (Minn. 1949)
- Neumann v. Edwards (Minn. 1920)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The attorneys have stipulated that this case shall he deemed to be before this court as upon a writ of certiorari, but no such writ was ever applied for or issued. They seek to review the findings of the district court in this manner, although no judgment has been entered in that court. Even if such findings could be reviewed by writ of certiorari, and if the parties could substitute a stipulation in place of the writ, neither of which can be conceded, the time within which such findings could be so reviewed had expired before the making of the present stipulation.
This court has never acquired jurisdiction of the ease and the proceedings in this court are dismissed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.