Itasca Cedar & Tie Co. v. McKinley

Minnesota Supreme Court
Itasca Cedar & Tie Co. v. McKinley, 129 Minn. 536 (Minn. 1915)
152 N.W. 653; 1915 Minn. LEXIS 762

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 7 citing opinions

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

Itasca Cedar & Tie Co. v. McKinley

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Upon a former appeal in this ease a new trial was granted. Itasca Cedar & Tie Co. v. McKinley, 124 Minn. 183, 144 N. W. 768. After the case had been remanded, plaintiff made an application to file an amended and supplemental complaint. This application was denied by the trial court, and plaintiff appealed from the order denying it. It is well settled that such an order, made before judgment, is not appealable. Hanley v. Board of Co. Commrs. of Cass County, 87 Minn. 209, 91 N. W. 756; Stromme v. Rieck, 110 Minn. 472, 125 N. W. 1021.

It follows that the appeal must be dismissed. So ordered.

Reference

Full Case Name
ITASCA CEDAR & TIE COMPANY v. GEORGE A. McKINLEY and Another
Cited By
7 cases
Status
Published