Itasca Cedar & Tie Co. v. McKinley
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 2013, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- Metropolitan Sheet Metal Journeyman & Apprentice Training Trust Fund v. County of Ramsey (Minn. 2013)
- Burkholder v. Burkholder (Minn. 1950)
- Hoyt v. Kittson County State Bank (Minn. 1930)
- Greber v. Harris (Minn. 1926)
- Swanson v. Alworth (Minn. 1923)
- Chicago Great Western Railroad v. Zahner (Minn. 1921)
- Blied v. Barnard (Minn. 1915)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Upon a former appeal in this ease a new trial was granted. Itasca Cedar & Tie Co. v. McKinley, 124 Minn. 183, 144 N. W. 768. After the case had been remanded, plaintiff made an application to file an amended and supplemental complaint. This application was denied by the trial court, and plaintiff appealed from the order denying it. It is well settled that such an order, made before judgment, is not appealable. Hanley v. Board of Co. Commrs. of Cass County, 87 Minn. 209, 91 N. W. 756; Stromme v. Rieck, 110 Minn. 472, 125 N. W. 1021.
It follows that the appeal must be dismissed. So ordered.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.