Lagergren v. Pennsylvania Railroad
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1922, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- Thompson v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad (Minn. 1922)
- Callaghan v. Union Pacific Railroad (Minn. 1921)
- Farmers Co-operative Equity Co. v. Payne (Minn. 1921)
- Merchants Elevator Co. v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. (Minn. 1920)
- Rishmiller v. Denver & Rio Grande Railroad (Minn. 1916)
- Weinard v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. (D. Minn. 1924)
- Davis v. Farmers Co-Operative Equity Co. (Supreme Court of the United States 1923)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The summons in this action was served upon a resident soliciting freight agent of defendant, a foreign corporation. Defendant appeared specially and moved to set the service aside, on the ground, that it conferred no jurisdiction over the person of defendant and;
The case is controlled by the decision in Armstrong v. New York Central & H. R. R. Co. 129 Minn. 104, 151 N. W. 917, where substantially the same question was presented. North Wisconsin Cattle Co. v. Oregon Short Line R. Co. 105 Minn. 198, 117 N. W. 391, is not in point. That decision was rendered prior to the amendment of the statute providing for the service of process upon foreign corporations. Chapter 218, p. 274, Laws 1913. The case of Simon v. Southern Ry. Co. 236 U. S. 115, is, on its facts, unlike the case at bar, and therefore not controlling.
Order affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.