Hunt v. Meeker County Abstract & Loan Co.

Minnesota Supreme Court
Hunt v. Meeker County Abstract & Loan Co., 130 Minn. 530 (Minn. 1915)
152 N.W. 866; 1915 Minn. LEXIS 615

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 3 citing opinions

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

Hunt v. Meeker County Abstract & Loan Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This court reversed the judgment of the trial court in the above entitled cause and the remittitur was transmitted to and filed in that court. Plaintiff now applies to this court to direct the trial court to make new and amended findings of fact and render judgment in his favor without a new trial. This application must be denied for the reason that, when the remittitur was filed in the lower court, the jurisdiction of this court over the cause came to an end. Rud v. Board of Co. Commrs. of Pope County, 66 Minn. 358, 68 N. W. 1062, 69 N. W. 886. It appears from the moving papers that the trial court refused to make new and amended findings of fact upon an ex parte application of plaintiff made after the cause had been remanded. The learned trial judge ruled correctly. Lawton v. Fiske, 129 Minn. 380, 152 N. W. 774.

Application denied.

Reference

Full Case Name
ALVA R. HUNT v. MEEKER COUNTY ABSTRACT & LOAN COMPANY
Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published