Minnesota Supreme Court, 1915

Johnson v. Crescent Creamery Co.

Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided July 2, 1915

130 Minn. 533; 153 N.W. 525; 1915 Minn. LEXIS 619 (Minnesota Reports)

Counsel

Barrows, Stewart & Ordway, for appellant., Wickersham & Churchill, for respondent.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1915, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Sherwood v. Crescent Creamery Co. (Minn. 1915)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff was injured in the same accident as was the plaintiff in Sherwood *534v. Crescent Creamery Company, supra, page 263, 153 N. W. 525. Hie only claim on this appeal is that the verdict of $2,500 is excessive. We have examined the testimony and conclude that the verdict, while liberal, is not so out of proportion to fair compensation for the conditions testified to by plaintiff and her witnesses that we ought to interfere.

Order affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.