Minnesota Supreme Court, 1916

Fitzgibbins v. Yennie

Fitzgibbins v. Yennie
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided April 7, 1916
132 Minn. 473; 157 N.W. 114; 1916 Minn. LEXIS 827 (Minnesota Reports)

Fitzgibbins v. Yennie

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Action in claim and delivery for the possession of certain personal property. The property was taken by the sheriff, but was rebonded by and returned to defendant. Whereupon defendant moved to “set aside and vacate” the action on the ground that it could not be maintained since by the complaint it appears that the parties to the action are owners of the property as tenants in common. The motion was denied and defendant appealed. Plaintiff moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the order is not appealable. *474The motion is granted. The motion, below to “vacate -and set aside the action” was in effect a motion to dismiss the action and the order denying the same is clearly not appealable. Pillsbury v. Foley, 61 Minn. 434, 63 N. W. 1027.

Appeal dismissed.

October, 1915, term calendar.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.