Stauning v. Crookston Mercantile Co.
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 2002, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- In re Kyllonen (Bankr. D. Minn. 2001)
- Wilson v. First National Bank (Minn. 1953)
- Vought v. Kanne (8th Cir. 1926)
- In re the Estate of Riggle (Minn. Ct. App. 2002)
- Dietz v. Becker (In re Becker) (United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of The Eighth Circuit 1998)
- Michael S. Dietz v. Terrance J. Becker (United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of The Eighth Circuit 1998)
- Cysewski v. Steingraber (Minn. 1946)
- Eberhart v. National Citizens Bank (Minn. 1927)
- Gale v. Hopkins (Minn. 1925)
- Cope v. Merriam (Mich. 1916)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff is the owner of a lot in the city of Crookston 50 feet in width and 150 feet in length, and has a small dwelling house on the westerly 25 feet thereof which he rents to third parties, and a small store building on the easterly 25 feet thereof at the rear of which he and his family have resided for several years. The only question for decision is whether plaintiff is entitled to hold the entire lot as his homestead or only the easterly 25 feet thereof upon which the building in which he resides is located. This question is settled in plaintiff’s favor by the prior decisions of this court. See Natonal Bank of the Republic v. Banholzer, 69 Minn. 24, 71 N. W. 919, and Lockey v. Lockey, 112 Minn. 512, 128 N. W. 833, and the cases cited therein.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.