Sweeney v. Village of Ellsworth
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1958, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- Carlos v. MTL, INC. (Haw. Ct. App. 1994)
- Holmes v. Holmes (Minn. 1958)
- Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. Borgen (Minn. 1932)
- Willey v. W. J. Hoggson Corp. (Fla. 1925)
- Bellrichard v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. (Wis. 1945)
- Belsky v. Druzstvo Cesko-Narodni Sine (Okla. 1924)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Action to recover a reward offered by defendant village for the apprehension and conviction of the murderer or murderers of one Dillehay. De
We do not need to decide whether or not the order is appealable, as it seems clear that the appeal should be dismissed on the second ground urged. While the bond on appeal was in form a supersedeas, it was not approved as required by the statute or at all. It .therefore did not stay further proceedings in the district court, and that court had power to make the order of dismissal. The case having been dismissed, the appeal from the order striking out the reply presents nothing but a moot question.
Appeal dismissed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.