Minnesota Supreme Court, 1917

Melin v. Maybury

Melin v. Maybury
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided July 6, 1917 · Pee
137 Minn. 478; 163 N.W. 1069; 1917 Minn. LEXIS 778 (Minnesota Reports)

Melin v. Maybury

Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

Plaintiffs procured a default judgment against defendant for rent. The court granted the motion of defendant to set aside this judgment and be permitted to answer. The answer was filed and plaintiffs moved to strike it out as sham and frivolous. The court granted this motion, but gave defendant leave to serve an amended answer. Plaintiffs appealed from this order, in that it denied judgment in favor of plaintiffs, and granted defendant leave to answer.

We do not decide that the order is appealable. We hold that there was no abuse of discretion.

Order affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.