State ex rel. Jefferson v. District Court
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1955, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- Marsolek v. Miller Waste Mills (Minn. 1955)
- Haller v. Northern Pump Co. (Minn. 1943)
- Plotke v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. (Minn. 1941)
- United States Gypsum Co. v. McMichael (Okla. 1930)
- Valeri v. Village of Hibbing (Minn. 1926)
- Fraze v. McClelland Co. (Iowa 1925)
- Hogan v. Twin City Amusement Trust Estate (Minn. 1923)
- Babich v. Oliver Iron Mining Co. (Minn. 1923)
- Walker v. Minnesota Steel Co. (Minn. 1926)
- Mississippi Central R. R. v. Lott (Miss. 1918)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This is a case under the Workmen’s Compensation Law in which the district court of Ramsey county awarded compensation to Mary Ballauf for the death of her husband Joseph Ballauf. The question presented is whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain the finding of the court that the death of Joseph Ballauf was caused by injuries which he sustained while in the employ of the relator Jefferson. That he was crushed under a load of lumber and suffered several broken ribs and other lesser injuries, and that he was confined to his bed from that time until his death six weeks later, is conceded; but the relators contend that his death was caused solely by disease, 'and did not result in consequence of the injuries which he sustained. An autopsy disclosed that he had pulmonary tuberculosis in such an advanced stage that one lung had been entirely destroyed and the other to a considerable extent; also that he was suffering from other diseases. The relators called three physicians who testified that, in their opinion, his death was caused by pulmonary tuberculosis, and that the injuries which he had sustained pulmonary tuberculosis, and .that the injuries which he had sustained called no physicians, but other witnesses testified that the deceased had worked continuously at hard labor until the accident, had apparently been in good health at all times theretofore, and had never been able to leave his bed thereafter. In view of all the circumstances, we are unable to say that it conclusively appears that the injuries sustained had no part in causing his death, nor that the trial court was concluded by the testimony of the experts. The decision of the trial court is affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.