Minnesota Supreme Court, 1917

State ex rel. Henderson v. Reed

State ex rel. Henderson v. Reed
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided July 20, 1917
138 Minn. 468; 163 N.W. 985; 1917 Minn. LEXIS 956 (Minnesota Reports)

Counsel

Thomas J. Newman and Harvey O. Sargeant, for appellant., Lyndon A. Smith, Attorney General, and C. Louis Weeks, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1927, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

State ex rel. Henderson v. Reed

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This case is in all respects similar to that of State v. Reed, supra, page 468, 163 N. W. 984. The two, cases were submitted together upon the same facts' and the same argument. For the reasons stated in that case, the relator is remanded to the custody of the respondent, the warden of the state prison, who will deliver him to the district court of Ramsey county for the imposition of a lawful sentence nunc pro tunc.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.