State ex rel. Gibson v. Julius
State ex rel. Gibson v. Julius
Opinion of the Court
On examination before a justice of the peace upon a charge of carnal inow
The sole contention of relator on this appeal is that there was no competent evidence on the hearing before the committing magistrate reasonably tending to show that a crime was committed, or that there was probable-cause for believing relator guilty. The complaining witness refused to testify on the hearing to the material facts, but she did testify that the facts contained in a written statement made by her a fe^ days after the crime was committed were true. On the entire record we think that the evidence, though it might not be sufficient to support a conviction, was sufficient to justify the justice in finding that a crime had been committed, and that there was probable cause for holding the defendant to the grand jury.
Order affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.