Minnesota Supreme Court, 1918

Nelson v. Berkner

Nelson v. Berkner
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided May 3, 1918 · Cubiam
140 Minn. 504; 167 N.W. 423; 1918 Minn. LEXIS 662 (Minnesota Reports)

Counsel

Pfaender & Erickson, for appellant., Albert Hauser, pro se.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1931, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Nelson v. Berkner

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Pee Cubiam.

The plaintiff sued the defendant in an action for the recovery of money. Before trial they settled for $500 without the consent of the plaintiff’s attorney. The plaintiff had a contract with his attorney for one-half of the-recovery. No question is made as to the validity of the contract. The plaintiff did not pay his attorney, and the attorney is unable'to collect it. The attorney was entitled to a lien for his agreed compensation. G-. S. 1913, *505§ 4955. Tlie court ordered judgment in favor of the attorney and against the defendant for $250. This was right.

Order affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.