State ex rel. Quale v. Penney

Minnesota Supreme Court
State ex rel. Quale v. Penney, 144 Minn. 463 (Minn. 1919)
174 N.W. 611; 1919 Minn. LEXIS 763

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 2 citing opinions

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

State ex rel. Quale v. Penney

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The respondent in this a mandamus proceeding moved for judgment on the pleadings. The court filed an order granting the motion and directing judgment to be entered accordingly. Relator appeals from the order. No judgment has been entered. The order is not appealable. In ordinary actions no appeal lies from an order granting or denying a motion for judgment on the pleadings. It is not perceived why a different rule should obtain as to like orders in mandamus proceedings.

The appeal is dismissed.

Reference

Full Case Name
STATE EX REL. THEODORE QUALE v. GUY A. PENNEY
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published