State ex rel. Quale v. Penney
Minnesota Supreme Court
State ex rel. Quale v. Penney, 144 Minn. 463 (Minn. 1919)
174 N.W. 611; 1919 Minn. LEXIS 763
Can I rely on this case?
Yes — no negative treatment found
- —
- —
Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.
State ex rel. Quale v. Penney
Opinion of the Court
The respondent in this a mandamus proceeding moved for judgment on the pleadings. The court filed an order granting the motion and directing judgment to be entered accordingly. Relator appeals from the order. No judgment has been entered. The order is not appealable. In ordinary actions no appeal lies from an order granting or denying a motion for judgment on the pleadings. It is not perceived why a different rule should obtain as to like orders in mandamus proceedings.
The appeal is dismissed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- STATE EX REL. THEODORE QUALE v. GUY A. PENNEY
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published