State ex rel. Quale v. Penney
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1942, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- State Ex Rel. Gresham v. Delaney (Minn. 1942)
- Burns v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. (Minn. 1939)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The respondent in this a mandamus proceeding moved for judgment on the pleadings. The court filed an order granting the motion and directing judgment to be entered accordingly. Relator appeals from the order. No judgment has been entered. The order is not appealable. In ordinary actions no appeal lies from an order granting or denying a motion for judgment on the pleadings. It is not perceived why a different rule should obtain as to like orders in mandamus proceedings.
The appeal is dismissed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.