Vorlander v. Hokenson

Minnesota Supreme Court
Vorlander v. Hokenson, 145 Minn. 484 (Minn. 1920)
175 N.W. 995
Cubiam

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 3 citing opinions

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

Vorlander v. Hokenson

Opinion of the Court

Pee Cubiam.

The facts bring this case within the rule stated and applied in State v. Houghton, 134 Minn. 226, 158 N. W. 1017, and State v. City of Minneapolis, 136 Minn. 479, 162 N. W. 477. No distinction in point of substance can be *485made between the facts there presented and those here before the court, and the decisions there rendered are followed and applied.

The order appealed from is therefore reversed.

Reference

Full Case Name
CHRISTIAN VORLANDER AND OTHERS v. A. J. HOKENSON AND ANOTHER. A. J. HOKENSON
Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published