Egekvist v. Minnetonka & White Bear Navigation Co.
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1930, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- Hoffman v. Piper (Minn. 1930)
- Thompson v. Harry W. Smith Auto Livery Co. (Minn. 1923)
- Anderson v. Boone County Abstract Company (Mo. 1967)
- Wlodarek v. Thrift (Md. 1940)
- Hendren v. Crescent City Seltzer & Mineral Water Co. (La. Ct. App. 1925)
- Michel Bros. v. Mallynn (La. Ct. App. 1925)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff had a verdict of $125 for damages .to his automobile caused by a collision with defendant’s autobus, and defendant appealed from an order denying a new trial.
An examination of the record satisfies us that the questions of negligence and contributory negligence were both for the jury.
The only other question raised is whether the court erred in refusing to strike out plaintiff’s testimony as to the amount of damages, on the ground that this testimony was based on the amount charged him for repairing the machine, and that he had no personal knowledge of the value of such repairs. He testified to the value of the machine immediately before and immediately after the accident, but admitted on cross-examination that
Order affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.