Minnesota Supreme Court, 1920

Wilson v. Tauer

Wilson v. Tauer
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided December 17, 1920 · Pee
147 Minn. 466; 180 N.W. 93; 1920 Minn. LEXIS 782 (Minnesota Reports)

Counsel

Albert OMlgren, for appellant., George E. Erieson, for respondent.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1980, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Wilson v. Tauer

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

The appeal in the above entitled action was taken from the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the court, made after trial without a jury. The order is not appealable. Von Glahn v. Sommer, 11 Minn. 132 (203); Johnson v. Northern Pacific, F. F. & B. H. Ry. Co. 39 Minn. 30, 38 N. W. 804; Holliston v. Ernston, 120 Minn. 507, 139 N. W. 805.

Appeal dismissed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.