Minnesota Supreme Court, 1922

Thompson v. Berg

Thompson v. Berg
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided April 13, 1922
151 Minn. 560; 187 N.W. 703; 1922 Minn. LEXIS 718 (Minnesota Reports)

Counsel

J. A. Hendricks, for appellants., James E. Montague, for respondent.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1932, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Thompson v. Berg

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The appeal in this case is from an order dismissing an appeal from the municipal court of the city of Crookston. The order appealed from orders that “judgment be entered accordingly.” The practice in such cases is the same as in appeals from justice to district courts. Laws 1895, p. 589, c. 329, § 38; G. S. 1913, § 280; Santala v. Hill, 143 Minn. 289, 173 N. W. 651. An order dismissing such an appeal is not appealable. Appeal lies only from the judgment entered in district court. Graham v. Conrad, 66 Minn. 470, 69 N. W. 215.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.