Minnesota Supreme Court, 1922

Fish v. Frink

Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided June 9, 1922

152 Minn. 552; 188 N.W. 571; 1922 Minn. LEXIS 602 (Minnesota Reports)

Counsel

Charles E. Schwarg, for appellants., Carsten L. Jacobson, for respondent.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1944, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Hammond v. Flour City Coal and Oil Co. (Minn. 1944)
Doyle v. Swanson (Minn. 1939)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This is an action in forcible entry and unlawful detainer commenced in the municipal court of Minneapolis to recover possession of premises after an alleged default in a contract of sale. After a trial a decision was filed and judgment for possession was rendered.

The questions argued in appellant’s brief all relate to the sufficiency of evidence and to rulings made on the trial. The case was tried without a reporter and no record of testimony was made. There is no bill1 of exceptions or settled case. In the absence of some record this court has no means of determining the questions sought to be reviewed and the judgment must be affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.