Svendsgaard v. Svendsgaard
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1925, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Van Dam v. Baker (Minn. 1925)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Tbe trial court granted defendant’s motion to dissolve a writ of attacbment issued upon tbe ground of a fraudulent disposition of property. Tbe plaintiff appeals.
Tbe defendant meets tbe affidavit for attacbment by a direct denial. Tbe plaintiff’s showing in opposition does not overcome it as a matter of law; indeed, it would be difficult to sustain an order of tbe trial court refusing to dissolve. It is unnecessary to discuss tbe affidavits. Most of tbe record is matter extraneous to tbe issue arising on tbe motion.
Order affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.