Stoneman v. Smyth
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1923, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Flaaten v. Lyons (Minn. 1923)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This is a companion case to that of Lillian M. Stoneman against the same defendants, supra, page 331. It was submitted upon the record therein, and the same disposition must follow, viz.:
The judgment against the defendant and appellant Smyth is affirmed and the judgment in favor of t'he defendant and respondent WashburnCrosby Company is reversed, and the cause is remitted with direction to the court below to enter judgment upon the verdict rendered against said respondent.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.