In re the Removal of Schmidt

Minnesota Supreme Court
In re the Removal of Schmidt, 154 Minn. 539 (Minn. 1923)
191 N.W. 939; 1923 Minn. LEXIS 678

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 4 citing opinions

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

In re the Removal of Schmidt

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The petition with an order requiring respondent, Carl B. Schmidt, to appear and answer the charge made therein having been duly served, respondent appeared by his attorney, Leslie C. Smith, as did also Mr. V. C. Pidgeon for the petitioner, who offered in evidence a certified copy of a conviction of said respondent of the crime of subornation of perjury as alleged in the petition.

Now having considered the argument presented 'by respondent, and finding the charge made in the petition true,

It Is Ordered that judgment be entered removing said Carl B. Schmidt, also known as Carl B. Smith, from the office of an attorney at law, and striking his name from the roll of attorneys entitled to practice in the courts of this state.

Reference

Full Case Name
IN RE APPLICATION FOR THE REMOVAL OF CARL B. SCHMIDT AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW
Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published