In re the Removal of Schmidt
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1985, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Matter of Discipline of Kraemer (Minn. 1985)
- Matter of Kimmel (Minn. 1982)
- In re the Disciplinary Action against Kimmel (Minn. 1982)
- In re Disbarment of John G. Priebe (Minn. 1940)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The petition with an order requiring respondent, Carl B. Schmidt, to appear and answer the charge made therein having been duly served, respondent appeared by his attorney, Leslie C. Smith, as did also Mr. V. C. Pidgeon for the petitioner, who offered in evidence a certified copy of a conviction of said respondent of the crime of subornation of perjury as alleged in the petition.
Now having considered the argument presented 'by respondent, and finding the charge made in the petition true,
It Is Ordered that judgment be entered removing said Carl B. Schmidt, also known as Carl B. Smith, from the office of an attorney at law, and striking his name from the roll of attorneys entitled to practice in the courts of this state.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.