Minnesota Supreme Court, 1923

Kannellos v. Great Northern Railway Co.

Kannellos v. Great Northern Railway Co.
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided December 10, 1923
157 Minn. 505; 196 N.W. 280; 1923 Minn. LEXIS 928 (Minnesota Reports)

Counsel

McCoy & Hansen, for appellant., M. L. Countryman and Baldwin, Baldwin, Holmes & Mayall, for respondent.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1978, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Kannellos v. Great Northern Railway Co.

Cases that cite this one

15 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of the St. Louis county district court entered in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff in an action brought by the plaintiff to recover for personal injuries based upon the Federal Safety Appliance Act. The questions presented are those decided by this court on an appeal by the plaintiff from an order sustaining a general demurrer interposed by the defendant to plaintiff’s complaint, which decision of this court is reported in 151 Minn. 157, 186 N. W. 389. Following the decision in that ease, the judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.