Farmers Merchants National Bank v. R.H. Mies
Minnesota Supreme Court
Farmers Merchants National Bank v. R.H. Mies, 200 N.W. 748 (Minn. 1924)
161 Minn. 518
PER CURIAM.
Farmers Merchants National Bank v. R.H. Mies
Opinion of the Court
Action on a promissory note, plaintiff, an indorsee, claiming to be a holder in due course. The defense was want of consideration and fraud. The trial was to the court' without a jury. The decision was for plaintiff, and this appeal is from an order denying defendant a new trial.
The court found that plaintiff was a holder in due course, and there is nothing in the record justifying our interference with that finding, which of course controls the result.
Order affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Farmers Merchants Naitonal Bank of Cannon Falls v. R.H. Mies. [Fn1]
- Status
- Published