Minnesota Supreme Court, 1924

Farmers Merchants National Bank v. R.H. Mies

Farmers Merchants National Bank v. R.H. Mies
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided November 21, 1924 · PER CURIAM.
200 N.W. 748; 161 Minn. 518 (North Western Reporter)

Farmers Merchants National Bank v. R.H. Mies

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Action on a promissory note, plaintiff, an indorsee, claiming to be a holder in due course. The defense was want of consideration and fraud. The trial was to the court' without a jury. The decision was for plaintiff, and this appeal is from an order denying defendant a new trial.

The court found that plaintiff was a holder in due course, and there is nothing in the record justifying our interference with that finding, which of course controls the result.

Order affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.