Baxter v. Orinoco Co.
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1960, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Dempsey v. Meighen (Minn. 1960)
- Northern Oil & Gas Co. v. Birkeland (Minn. 1925)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from an order fixing and allowing a receiver’s compensation for services and expenses in a corporation. Respondent moves to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that it was not perfected within the time limited by statute.
It appears that the statutory notice of the filing of the court’s order fixing and allowing the receiver’s compensation was served on September 14, 1923. The notice of appeal was served and filed on October 3, 1923, together with the bond on appeal, but the statutory fee of $15 was not deposited in the clerk’s office until October 27, 13 days after the time for appealing had expired. Under the statute the appeal fee must be deposited within the statutory time for taking the appeal. This not having been done, the appeal did not become effective. Laws 1917, p. 80, chapter 66. Wheeler v. Crane, 141 Minn. 78, 169 N. W. 476, 597. Respondent is entitled to have the appeal dismissed. It is so ordered.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.