Anderson v. Minnesota Steel Co.

Minnesota Supreme Court
Anderson v. Minnesota Steel Co., 160 Minn. 410 (Minn. 1924)
200 N.W. 475; 1924 Minn. LEXIS 767

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 2 citing opinions

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

Anderson v. Minnesota Steel Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Certiorari to review an order of the Industrial Commission denying relator’s claim for compensation.

The relator is suffering from diabetes but was not afflicted with the disease until several months after the accident out of which the claim arises. The record presents the simple issue of fact, affirmed by relator’s evidence and denied by that for respondent, whether the disease was caused by the injury. Upon conflicting evidence, the referee found that it was not. The Industrial Commission reached the same conclusion. In such a situation we are not at liberty to interfere with the result.

Order affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
DONALD ANDERSON v. MINNESOTA STEEL COMPANY
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published