Anderson v. Minnesota Steel Co.
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1964, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Gerhardt v. Welch (Minn. 1964)
- Walker v. Minnesota Steel Co. (Minn. 1926)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Certiorari to review an order of the Industrial Commission denying relator’s claim for compensation.
The relator is suffering from diabetes but was not afflicted with the disease until several months after the accident out of which the claim arises. The record presents the simple issue of fact, affirmed by relator’s evidence and denied by that for respondent, whether the disease was caused by the injury. Upon conflicting evidence, the referee found that it was not. The Industrial Commission reached the same conclusion. In such a situation we are not at liberty to interfere with the result.
Order affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.