Gerlich v. Gerlich
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1945, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Kaehler v. Kaehler (Minn. 1945)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Action for divorce upon the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment. There were findings for the defendant. The plaintiff appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial.
The record has been carefully examined. Neither party has been blameless. The trial court’s finding that the defendant did not cruelly and inhumanly treat the plaintiff, within the meaning of the statute, is well sustained. Stating it favorably to the plaintiff, the question of fact was for the trial court and might have been found for either. We doubt not that the findings were wisely made against the plaintiff’s contention. A review of the evidence is useless.
Order affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.