American Building & Construction Corp. v. Herrmann
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1953, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Sander v. Dieseth (Minn. 1950)
- Wolfe v. City of Austin (Minn. 1953)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This case is before us on an order to show cause why the venue should not be changed from Steams county to Hennepin county. It is an action to determine adverse claims to real estate situated in Stearns county. The defendants reside there. The plaintiff is a Minnesota corporation having its principal place of business there. Plaintiff desires to have the venue changed because it claims a fair and impartial trial cannot be had in Steams county. The motion was supported by numerous affidavits to the effect that plaintiff, on account of the business and local political activities of 'one of its principal officers and stockholders cannot have a fair trial in Stearns county. There were persuasive affidavits contra for defendants. It is suggested, but not much argued, that the convenience of witnesses would be promoted by the change. The issue is one of fact .and it is clear from the record that there was no abuse of discretion in denying the change of venue.
The order to show cause is discharged.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.