Baxter v. Orinoco Co.

Minnesota Supreme Court
Baxter v. Orinoco Co., 160 Minn. 535 (Minn. 1925)
202 N.W. 829; 1925 Minn. LEXIS 592

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 1 citing opinion

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

Baxter v. Orinoco Co.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The appeal herein was dismissed, upon the ground that appellant failed to comply with chapter 22, Laws 1917, requiring a deposit of $15 with the clerk.

This is a motion asking that the appeal be reinstated. We see no reason for so doing. It appears that appellant’s counsel requested appellant to attend to such matter in sufficient time. Appellant failed to comply with the request until it was too late. Appellant is alone at' fault in the matter. The motion is denied.

Reported in 202 N. W. 829.

Reference

Full Case Name
GEORGE N. BAXTER v. THE ORINOCO COMPANY, LTD.
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published