State v. Johanson

Minnesota Supreme Court
State v. Johanson, 211 N.W. 5 (Minn. 1926)
169 Minn. 272
PER CURIAM.

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 1 citing opinion

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

State v. Johanson

Opinion of the Court

*273 Pee Curiam.

Convicted in justice court of maintaining a nuisance in tbe nature of a dispensary of intoxicating liquor, defendant attempted to appeal to the district court. He neglected to have his appeal bond approved by the justice. The statute requires in connection with such an appeal “a recognizance, with sufficient surety, to be approved by the justice.” G. S. 1923, subd. 1, § 9129. Such a recognizance, so approved, is jurisdictional. This is an appeal from the order of the district court dismissing the attempted appeal from the justice court. For the reason indicated, that order was right and therefore is affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
State v. Godfred Johanson. [Fn1]
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published