McCarron v. Commercial Credit Trust
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1934, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Gowin v. Heider (Or. 1964)
- Saunders v. Commercial Credit Trust (Minn. 1934)
- Laird v. Byrd (Ark. 1928)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Action for conversion of a Ford coupe. After a verdict for plaintiff, defendant appeals from the order denying Ms motion for judgment or a new trial. The evidence for plaintiff shows a conversion during a five-day extension of payment granted by defendant, the assignee of the seller. The forfeiture was declared for default in the very payment the time for wMch according to plaintiff had been extended. The verdict settles the facts in favor of plaintiff. Even though the extension of payment be without consideration, there can be no declaration of forfeiture during the additional period thereby allowed for payment. Scheerschmidt v. Smith, 74 Minn. 224, 77 N. W. 34; Reinkey v. Findley Elec. Co. 147 Minn. 161, 180 N. W. 236.
No other assignment of error calls for consideration.
Order affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.