Twin City Fire Insurance v. Midland National Bank
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1941, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- S. T. McKnight Co. v. Tomkinson (Minn. 1941)
- Douglas State Bank v. Meyers (Minn. 1930)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Appeal by plaintiff from an order denying its motion for judgment against the garnishee whose disclosure was that it held certain personal property of the defendant as security for the payment of defendant’s promissory note to it. The record shows that the garnishee has sold the note for its face value. That sale carried with it the pledge of defendant’s collateral, the property sought to be held by this garnishment. Under G-. S. 1923, § 9376, it appearing that the garnishee had a lien on that property, plaintiff on motion might have been permitted to pay the amount of the secured debt and so procure for itself the benefit of the pledge. It did not pay the debt nor make an attempt to take advantage of this statute permitting it to do so. So for that reason alone plaintiff was not entitled to judgment against the garnishee.
Order affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.