Minnesota Supreme Court, 1926

Stern v. Zapf

Stern v. Zapf
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided March 12, 1926 · Wilson
207 N.W. 740; 166 Minn. 503; 1926 Minn. LEXIS 1236 (North Western Reporter)

Stern v. Zapf

Opinion of the Court

WILSON, C. J.

This is an action to recover upon a contract similar to the one in Stern v. Mayer, supra, page 346, except that the amount is to be paid β€œin monthly payments of $6.15 each, or more at my option, each month hereafter beginning with the month of October 1, 1917.” Upon the trial a verdict was directed for defendant. Plaintiff appealed from an order denying his alternative motion for judgment non obstante or a new trial.

Upon authority of Stern v. Mayer, supra, the order of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.