Stern v. Zapf
Stern v. Zapf
207 N.W. 740; 166 Minn. 503; 1926 Minn. LEXIS 1236
(North Western Reporter)
Stern v. Zapf
Opinion of the Court
This is an action to recover upon a contract similar to the one in Stern v. Mayer, supra, page 346, except that the amount is to be paid βin monthly payments of $6.15 each, or more at my option, each month hereafter beginning with the month of October 1, 1917.β Upon the trial a verdict was directed for defendant. Plaintiff appealed from an order denying his alternative motion for judgment non obstante or a new trial.
Upon authority of Stern v. Mayer, supra, the order of the trial court is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.