Minnesota Supreme Court, 1926

Rundlett v. Bankers National Bank

Rundlett v. Bankers National Bank
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided October 8, 1926 · Dibell, Holt
210 N.W. 631; 168 Minn. 436; 1926 Minn. LEXIS 1593 (North Western Reporter)

Counsel

L.K. Eaton and Selover, Schultz, Mansfield Bryan , for appellant. Deutsch, Loeffler Amick, Brill Maslon and Robert S Kolliner , for respondent.

Rundlett v. Bankers National Bank

Opinion of the Court

Dibell, J.

The demurrer of the plaintiff to the answer of the defendant was overruled and he' appeals.

The facts are substantially those alleged in the case of the same plaintiff against the Midland National Bank & Trust Company, supra, page 434, except that Henderson received payment of the cashier’s check issued by the Midland bank from the defendant, which later received payment from the Midland bank through the clearings. As in the case cited there is no merit in the demurrer.

Order affirmed.

Holt, J., took no part.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.